Risk level: Orange - High
RED: Severe
(+/- 4%) ORANGE: High (+/- 2%) YELLOW: Elevated (+/- 1%) BLUE: Guarded (+/- ½%)
"The U.S.
exit from the JCPOA will show that the Americans are isolated and are no longer
trustworthy for international interactions," Iranian Foreign Minister
Javad Zarif said
on Monday.
Trump has
until May 12 to decide on extending sanctions waivers for Iran. Calling the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action a shoddy deal, his decision against waivers would
take the United States out of the agreement that limits Iranian nuclear
ambitions. Iran is exporting around 1 million barrels per day, down from their
earlier peak of around 2.5 million bpd, but those extra barrels are important
in a tightened market. OPEC said commercial oil stocks in the advanced
economies of the OECD are down from their peak of 3.12 billion barrels in July
2016, when crude oil prices averaged $44.95 per barrel, to 2.83 billion barrels
in March 2018, when crude oil prices averaged $66.10 per barrel. By OPEC's
metrics, that corresponds to a decline of about 300 million barrels, which indicates
what Iranian oil there is flowing in the international market matters.
Collectively,
even if Iranian oil clients decided to look elsewhere, it would be hard to find
as Saudi Arabia is unlikely to move unless oil prices start to test the $100
per barrel market. But non-U.S. parties to the JCPOA have shown willingness to
maintain, at the very least, an open-door policy with Iran. European leaders
met with Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Jaberi Ansari last week. On
Monday, British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson met in Washington with his U.S.
counterpart, Mike Pompeo. Writing in The New York Times, Johnson said it would
be a mistake to jeopardize the deal.
"Only
Iran would gain from abandoning the restrictions on its nuclear program," he
wrote.
Trump,
meanwhile, has already expressed concern about higher oil prices, using has
preferred venue for communicating policy – Twitter – to complain that OPEC is
"at it again" by pushing oil prices to "very high" levels. When he wrote that on April 20, Brent was at
$74.62. It was above $76 per barrel by mid-day Monday. Higher oil prices mean
higher gas prices for American consumers and, guessing by his reaction, the OPEC
production agreement is offsetting some of the gains from U.S. tax reforms.
Gholamreza
Manouchehri, the deputy head of the National Iranian Oil Co., said nothing can
stop Iran. The IMF said Iranian economic recovery has in part been led by the non-oil
sector and real GDP growth is expected to be in the 4 percent range through
2019. That
assessment was made in March. Manouchehri said Monday that, under sanctions
pressure for decades, Iran can figure out how to preserve its market share.
So what about the
United States? If Boris Johnson is right, who stands to lose if it's Iran that
gains the upper hand? There are already suggestions of a recession emerging for
the world's leading economy at some point in the near future. A 2016 report
from Christiane Baumeister of the University of Notre Dame and Lutz Kilian of
the University of Michigan found "little net effect" on the U.S.
economy from that era's drop in crude oil prices. So the reverse must be true –
"little net effect" from a spike in crude oil prices. But if the
Iranian sanctions move is read through the same lens as the OPEC oil embargo, the U.S. recession in the 1970s
should serve as a reminder of the stakes at play in the economics behind the price of
oil. With little spare capacity available,
with manufacturing sectors under pressure from U.S. trade policies and with
inflation already under the microscope, backing out of the deal with Iran could
have a blowback effect for the U.S. economy.
We're issuing an
Orange alert, expecting crude oil prices to move by as much 2 percent for the week.
No comments:
Post a Comment